<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>United States Justice Foundation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://usjf.net/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://usjf.net</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Jun 2010 18:24:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Sestak issue an &#8216;impeachable offense&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://usjf.net/2010/05/sestak-issue-an-impeachable-offense/</link>
		<comments>http://usjf.net/2010/05/sestak-issue-an-impeachable-offense/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2010 14:07:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congressman Sestak]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News Channel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Sestak]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://usjf.net/?p=1534</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Share &#8216;It&#8217;s Valerie Plame, only bigger, a high crime and misdemeanor&#8217; By Drew Zahn © 2010 WorldNetDaily If a Democratic member of Congress is to be believed, there&#8217;s someone in the Obama administration who has committed a crime – and if the president knew about it, analysts say it could be grounds for impeachment. &#8220;This [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://usjf.net/2010/05/sestak-issue-an-impeachable-offense/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Menendez recall effort picks up conservative support</title>
		<link>http://usjf.net/2010/05/menendez-recall-effort-picks-up-conservative-support/</link>
		<comments>http://usjf.net/2010/05/menendez-recall-effort-picks-up-conservative-support/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2010 13:56:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bob Menendez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Jersey Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sussex County]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://usjf.net/?p=1530</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Share By: Alex Isenstadt Politico With the New Jersey Supreme Court hearing arguments next week, the tea party-led campaign to recall Sen. Robert Menendez (D-N.J.) is expanding its base of conservative support, with a dozen right-leaning legal organizations submitting an amicus brief in support of the recall push. The Conservative Legal Defense and Education Fund, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://usjf.net/2010/05/menendez-recall-effort-picks-up-conservative-support/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>USJF files motion to join in Sen. Menendez case</title>
		<link>http://usjf.net/2010/05/usjf-files-motion-to-join-in-sen-menendez-case/</link>
		<comments>http://usjf.net/2010/05/usjf-files-motion-to-join-in-sen-menendez-case/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2010 13:53:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal Briefs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Issues]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://usjf.net/?p=1528</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Share USJF files to join as amicus curiae in case New Jersey case to recall U.S. Sen. Menendez. menendezcldeforder menendez_recall_brief_from_printer motion_for_leave_to_appear_as_amicus_curiae]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://usjf.net/2010/05/usjf-files-motion-to-join-in-sen-menendez-case/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Maryland replies to USJF&#8217;s request in Obama case</title>
		<link>http://usjf.net/2010/05/maryland-replies-to-usjfs-request-in-obama-case/</link>
		<comments>http://usjf.net/2010/05/maryland-replies-to-usjfs-request-in-obama-case/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 May 2010 13:53:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Litigation over Obama's Citizenship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Replies from State Attorneys General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://usjf.net/?p=1523</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Share The Maryland Attorney General&#8217;s office replied.The state of Maryland has replied to USJF&#8217;s request in the Obama issue. The link is a PDF file of the letter they sent. usjfmdoffofag]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://usjf.net/2010/05/maryland-replies-to-usjfs-request-in-obama-case/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Alaska replies to USJF&#8217;s request in Obama case</title>
		<link>http://usjf.net/2010/05/alaska-replies-to-usjfs-request-in-obama-case/</link>
		<comments>http://usjf.net/2010/05/alaska-replies-to-usjfs-request-in-obama-case/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 May 2010 13:51:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Litigation over Obama's Citizenship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Replies from State Attorneys General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://usjf.net/?p=1522</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ShareAlaska&#8217;s Attorney General&#8217;s office replied. alaskaobamaltr]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://usjf.net/2010/05/alaska-replies-to-usjfs-request-in-obama-case/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>North Dakota responds to USJF&#8217;s query</title>
		<link>http://usjf.net/2010/05/north-dakota-responds-to-usjfs-query/</link>
		<comments>http://usjf.net/2010/05/north-dakota-responds-to-usjfs-query/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 13:55:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Litigation over Obama's Citizenship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Replies from State Attorneys General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://usjf.net/?p=1511</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ShareThe Attorney General of North Dakota replied to USJF&#8217;s query on Barack Obama. The Attorney General of North Dakota replied to the United States Justice Foundation&#8217;s query into looking into Barack Obama&#8217;s birth. northdakota]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://usjf.net/2010/05/north-dakota-responds-to-usjfs-query/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>An &#8216;illegal&#8217; mandate? No.  &#8212; with rebuttal</title>
		<link>http://usjf.net/2010/04/an-illegal-mandate-no-with-rebuttal/</link>
		<comments>http://usjf.net/2010/04/an-illegal-mandate-no-with-rebuttal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Apr 2010 03:19:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commerce Clause]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court of the United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wickard v. Filburn]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://usjf.net/?p=1506</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ShareBy Ruth Marcus Is Congress going through the ordeal of trying to enact health-care reform only to have one of the main pillars &#8212; requiring individuals to obtain insurance &#8212; declared unconstitutional? An interesting debate for a constitutional law seminar. In the real world, not a big worry. &#8220;This issue is not serious,&#8221; says Walter [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://usjf.net/2010/04/an-illegal-mandate-no-with-rebuttal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Revival of the 10th Amendment</title>
		<link>http://usjf.net/2010/04/the-revival-of-the-10th-amendment/</link>
		<comments>http://usjf.net/2010/04/the-revival-of-the-10th-amendment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Apr 2010 03:14:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Readers Speak Out]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://usjf.net/?p=1504</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ShareBy Michael Connelly Years ago, when I first started referring to the 10th Amendment to the Constitution in some cases that I argued in court, the opposing attorneys, and even some judges, would look at me as if they either didn’t understand me or they thought that I had lost my mind. Now, there is [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://usjf.net/2010/04/the-revival-of-the-10th-amendment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microchips in Obamacare? Not yet</title>
		<link>http://usjf.net/2010/04/microchips-in-obamacare-not-yet/</link>
		<comments>http://usjf.net/2010/04/microchips-in-obamacare-not-yet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 18:21:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medical device]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Radio-frequency identification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States Secretary of Health and Human Services]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://usjf.net/?p=1503</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Share Analysis: While not explicit, law opens door to future possibility By Bob Unruh WorldNetDaily The warnings are everywhere in the Internet: &#8220;Obamacare requires being microchipped,&#8221; &#8220;Obamacare Bugging You! It Will With a Microchip,&#8221; and &#8220;RFID Chip Impact in 36 Months,&#8221; but a new legal analysis says there just isn&#8217;t any language in President Obama&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://usjf.net/2010/04/microchips-in-obamacare-not-yet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>U.N. leadership questioned after Copenhagen confusion</title>
		<link>http://usjf.net/2010/04/un-leadership-questioned-after-copenhagen-confusion/</link>
		<comments>http://usjf.net/2010/04/un-leadership-questioned-after-copenhagen-confusion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Apr 2010 13:08:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copenhagen Accord]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://usjf.net/?p=1499</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Share Climate-change summit results only in &#8216;voluntary&#8217; accord WorldNetDaily UNITED NATIONS – As United Nations chief Ban Ki-moon enters his third year in office, speculation is building inside the diplomatic corps that the former South Korean foreign minister may be finished in his leadership post when his term expires in November 2011. While it is [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://usjf.net/2010/04/un-leadership-questioned-after-copenhagen-confusion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
